Soda ad trivializes social justice
April 7, 2017
What do you get when Kendall Jenner approaches armed police officers with a can of Pepsi during a peaceful protest?
Not an officer mistaking her fizzy drink as a gun and proceeding to shoot her with rubber bullets and bean bags nor do you see protesters in the background being tear gassed or pepper sprayed.
What you would instead see, in the now taken down “progressive” Pepsi advertisement, is what most people of color protesting for their rights and standing up against injustices won’t get: smiling civility.
When the ad first aired, much of social media expressed their dismay with Pepsi for not only inaccurately showcasing police response when they’re present at protests, but also making it easy for a white woman be liberated at a protest when it is nowhere near that simple for her black counterparts.
If only this entire time it would have have been expressed to protesters that all they needed was a nice cold can of pop.
The Ferguson protests would probably have received less news coverage than it did. Better yet, police probably would have welcomed them with open arms just as they did for women at the Women’s March rather than tear gas.
Most of us have seen or learned that, historically, people of color fall victim to police brutality.
But after Michael Brown’s death in 2014 sparked this generation’s outcry for justice for black lives, that awareness became more prevalent not only across social media but in conversations people were starting to have.
This leads me to question how no one in the meeting for that simple-minded commercial, realized gentrifying protests was a horrible idea?
It came off as trivializing and glamorizing real experiences people of color go through when protesting.
Marginalized groups aren’t out in the streets, risking their lives protesting to remind the world they have the right to water, their land, their bodies or their lives so they can get cool points or a nice photo-op for Instagram.
Bernice King — daughter of Martin Luther King Jr. and Coretta Scott King — said it best in an article she wrote about the problematic content of the ad for The Huffington Post.
“Some may say ‘It’s just a commercial.’ I say that the ad and the responses to it reflect deep issues around race, privilege and how we build the Beloved Community post-slavery and Jim Crow,” said King. “We cannot ignore that we are currently grappling with gross injustice and inhumanity.”
It could be easy for people who are not out there on the frontlines of protests for movements like Black Lives Matter to minimize those experiences by saying people are being dramatic about the ad, especially if these are the same people who refuse to listen to said protesters’ realities — that commercial definitely being far from it.
In the apology statement released April 5, PepsiCo said they were “trying to project a global message of unity, peace and understanding,” noting that they clearly missed that message and did not intend to make light of serious issues.
But what they — and all advertising companies — should be taking away from this is to hire more people of color. Talk and listen to community leaders and activist the next time you want to send a message that falls in line with social issues or Black Lives Matter.
To have a message that involves “understanding,” you need to first understand the movement at hand.
Joanna Perry-Folino
Apr 20, 2017 at 9:38 am
“Lighten up everyone.” “I’m so tired of PC comments” “Get a life, will you?” and isn’t that the crux of the matter: our very lives. Interconnected, woven into the fabric of America? R-E-S-P_E-C-T Tell you what it means to me? Aretha’s words. But sadly we are now run by corporate interests far too much in Hollywood and in advertising so garbage like this TV ad is out there and even if it was taken down, some young kid saw it and thought, “Isn’t my life worth more than a Pepsi?” Be careful folks….ads like this are pervasive in the US and maybe not quite as obvious.
Karina Chaube
Apr 18, 2017 at 12:25 am
I agree with everything stated in this article. I too, found the Pepsi commercial to be wrong in so many ways. Non-POC people have a hard time understanding the rights we have to go through and the protests that we involve ourselves in. Instead of coming up with a logical solution to demonstrate a way to stop police brutality during peaceful protests, they came up with some garbage “progressive” commercial that gentrifies what minorities go through on a daily basis. The entire commercial made zero sense, as if saying “you mean the whole time we were protesting and I was scared for my life, all I had to do was give an officer a can of Pepsi so I won’t get shot?” In reality, if a minority even walked up to a cop during these protests, peacefully, to try and reason with them they would most likely end up on the floor in a hold or shot. Another thing that irks me is that Kendall Jenner is not taking responsibility for participating in this uninformed commercial; instead, she is blacklisting anyone that dares asking her about it. She is a grown woman, she knew what she was getting herself into and she needs to own up to her situation. Instead of coming up with an informative type commercial and using an actual minority, they use a white model to reflect the feelings of minorities. Of course, the white girl walking up to the white officer is not going to get her shot at or gassed. Pepsi should have really thought this one through. Their apology was one that clearly missed the message of the situation entirely. It is really bothersome when companies portray white people in ads that have nothing to do with what white people face – which seems to be nothing at all. Even though I am glad that they took the commercial down, it does not change the fact that someone actually Okayed this “storyline” thinking it was a great idea and promoted unity. It did nothing of the sort, if anything it promoted white superiority.