Experience

Pittsburg seeks to curtail panhandling

Back to Article
Back to Article

Pittsburg seeks to curtail panhandling

Anthony Martinez

Anthony Martinez

Anthony Martinez

ROBERT PIERCE, @RobertP_EXP

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Everyone has seen the road signs around Contra Costa County urging drivers to “say no to panhandling” and “contribute to the solution” by donating to local charities. Several new signs have popped up in Antioch in the last few months on and around Somersville Road in particular.

However, the placing of the signs most likely had little to do with Somersville Road specifically or uniquely.

The signs all mention California Highway Code 22520.5, which makes it against the law to “solicit, display, sell, offer for sale, or otherwise vend or attempt to vend any merchandise or service” anywhere near a freeway. Somersville Road and Auto Center Drive, which Somersville Road leads into and also received an anti-panhandling sign recently, contain several onramps for California Delta Highway 4 and thus are no-solicitation zones under the Highway Code and are subject to signage.

Specifically, the Code states that the solicitation is not allowed within any of the following, with some minor exceptions:

  • The right-of-way of any freeway, including any on ramp, off ramp, or roadway shoulder which lies within the right-of-way of the freeway.
  • Any roadway or adjacent shoulder within 500 feet of a freeway off ramp or on ramp.
  • Any sidewalk within 500 feet of a freeway off ramp or on ramp, when vending or attempting to vend to vehicular traffic.

“I’m not sure about the signs… I’m unaware either way if they are effective,” said Lieutenant Chad Wehrmeister about the anti-panhandling signs in the local area.

Wehrmeister stated he could not recall any incidents of panhandling on Los Medanos College’s campus that Police Services has had to deal with. The Antioch Police Department could not be reached for comment at time of publication.

Regardless of the sign’s efficacy, not all in the area agree with their construction. Antioch citizen Maria Valle stated that she feels it is “not right” for the state to have laws against panhandling, and that it should be up to “individual decision” whether they want to give money to beggars, and not for the state to ban panhandling outright. She even stated she would like to see a petition to have the signs removed or the law overturned.

“Everybody needs an opportunity to make money,” said Valle.

Panhandling continues to be a charged issue for many; in a press release last September, the nearby Pittsburg Police Department called panhandling “a huge societal concern for many communities, representing a visible indicator of blight” and stated that they are “committed to providing an environment in which residents, merchants, and visitors to the City are not accosted by panhandlers.”

On the other hand, the American Civil Liberties Union has made several statements this year claiming that anti-panhandling ordinances in Iowa requiring a permit to panhandle are “unconstitutional” and a “block” to freedom of speech.

However, back in California, Highway Code 22520.5 still states soliciting near a highway is illegal, and signs like those on Somersville will likely stay standing.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
1 Comment

One Response to “Pittsburg seeks to curtail panhandling”

  1. Gumby Koontz on November 15th, 2018 3:44 pm

    Do not give money to panhandlers.. but you probably can give food or bottled water that will do a lot of good to them. Lots of people go to fast food joints and they can order something extra like FF or $1 meals for giving to panhandlers.. They will be too full to stick around long.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
Navigate Right
The student news site of Los Medanos College
Pittsburg seeks to curtail panhandling