Exhaust law update backfires

Local assemblyman authors bill to reinstate correctable violations.

Back to Article
Back to Article

Exhaust law update backfires

Actuators like these are currently illegal.

Actuators like these are currently illegal.

A.R. Broom

Actuators like these are currently illegal.

A.R. Broom

A.R. Broom

Actuators like these are currently illegal.

A.R. Broom, @AlexanderRBroom

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

The clouds of confusion and firey outrage among automotive enthusiasts after the enacting of California State Assembly Bill 1824 have finally subsided. From the ashes have recently come a bill co-authored by Jim Frazier, the state assembly member who represents Los Medanos College and surrounding areas, which plans to restore the correctability of the violation so many enthusiasts fear.

The two violations in question, which relate to the modifications of vehicle exhausts, can now come with a fine of up to $1000. But according to the SEMA Action Network, a lobbying group supported by the Specialty Equipment Marketing Association, fines of that severity are rarely given on the first offense.

Introduced last year by the State Assembly’s Budget Committee, AB 1824 was a direct request from an unknown member of the former Governor Jerry Brown’s administration, according to Nannette Miranda, Communications Director for the Office of Assemblymember Phil Ting, chair of the Budget Committee.

The fourth section of the Assembly Bill only pertains to two existing California Vehicle Codes. Section 27151(a) states that a person cannot modify their exhaust to be louder than the legal limit of 95 dB. The Bill also refers to Section 27150, the other citable code in AB 1824, which says, “no muffler or exhaust system shall be equipped with a cutout, bypass, or similar device.”

This law is not just problematic for modified cars enthusiasts. There are currently vehicles available for sale which come with said devices straight from the factory. These laws put citizens at risk for costly violations at the discretion of law enforcement officials which they may not be able to fix, and have to deal with after the fact.

Some enthusiasts, like LMC student Alex Rivas, believe these laws will leave room for discrimination. Rivas says he understands where the law may be coming from, that it’s meant to lessen nuisances due to noise from cars and motorcycles alike, but he does not see the need for such fines when enthusiasts already spend enough money on their cars.

“I don’t see the point in [making the fine mandatory;] they’re going after a small portion of the population, hoping to get a big effect,” said Rivas. “[You] could have the quietest exhaust on [a] Mustang and still be able to do donuts.”

For Rivas there is no true correlation between having a loud exhaust and those who do stunts with their cars.

“There’s a broad spectrum of automotive enthusiasts and going after one group of us is going to make it worse for all of us,” said Rivas.

Rivas claims that more than 20 people in his circle have been adversely affected by the legislation, some of those with stock exhausts.

Jason Dearman, LMC’s Automotive Technology department chair, believes Frazier’s bill is taking a step in the right direction, but still thinks there is too much regulation on vehicle noise.

“I disagree with the regulation in total, but if he’s willing to walk it back, that’s great,” said Dearman.

Dearman, who proclaimed his enjoyment of custom cars, is in favor of having emissions reduction equipment, and even noise limits but wishes for simpler regulations.

“I agree with the exhaust laws all the way to the [post-catalytic convertor oxygen sensor,] keep the environment clean,” said Dearman. “But everything after that, it doesn’t matter, it’s not an emissions problem…When you take that [freedom to modify] away, you take away people’s ability to build a car the way they want it.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
About the Contributor
A.R. Broom, Copy Chief

"I'm a up and coming yuppie."
-Raphael Orlove


2 Responses to “Exhaust law update backfires”

  1. Daren Matthews on March 24th, 2019 1:58 pm

    It’s a very simple equation, while Americans are free to worship their vehicles in any manner they wish, sometimes in very immature fashions like assuming loud pipes are impressive, what right do they have to force other Americans to worship them too? Tell me, what right protected by law does anyone have to impose on other Americans inside their own homes? Do not all Americans deserve peace and quiet in their own homes? More importantly, do not all Americans deserve respect from other Americans. Loud pipes just give the middle finger to all other Americans so some can stroke their egos and man hoods with their vehicles. Loud pipes are a choice not a necessity, and why some choose to impose on others willingly escapes me. In the end it’s un-American to force one’s car into other Americans homes, especially if those homes are lived in by the sick and elderly.

  2. JI'm daniels on March 26th, 2019 6:50 pm

    Where does it say in the constitution. That you have the freedom to always have your own sanitarium? Build thicker walls or skin whichever suits you.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Navigate Left
Navigate Right
The student news site of Los Medanos College
Exhaust law update backfires