Trustee election draws interest
Voters have a new option
September 29, 2016
Voters have a new option
September 29, 2016
An 11th-hour challenger has turned what was initially an uncontested election into a full-fledged race, giving Contra Costa County Ward 5 voters the opportunity this November to choose who they want for their Contra Costa Community College District trustee.
Valerie Romero-Lopez
Sep 30, 2016 at 7:12 pm
The existing Brentwood Center is costing $68,000 a month and its location
is not suitable as it sits in a high density retail establishment.
The new center is planned to be completed and open approximately Sep
2020 to support student needs in a 17 acre environment in the Trilogy/Marsh
Creek Road Location.
I support the Governing Board’s decision to go ahead with the center as part
of phased plan for enrollment with the first phase planned to support
forecasted enrollment with a future phase to increase capacity as enrollment
increases.
The initial facilities that are being constructed will provide what is required
for the existing student population and is not expected to reach capacity for
many years, at which point the 2nd phase of the project will be reviewed for
additional construction. This is a SMART approach as it ensures that the
costs are aligned with the needs of students when it opens and for future
students.
Mr. Enholms position’s has resulted in numerous delays. Delaying the
construction of the center would not serve the needs of the district or its
students and would ultimately result in higher costs with no benefits to the
district, its students and its taxpayers.
Delays also impact the jobs of workers who would contribute to its
construction.
Mr. Enholm who was an instructor at DeVry and Heald, the two failed For-
Profit institution, four years ago ran on the platform opposing the 17 acre
campus and advocated for a 110 acre campus.
He voted for the Brentwood Center as part of the Governing Board
recommendation and helped in its BOND passage, but continues to pursue a
bigger campus even though no location is available and a bigger campus is
not approved by the Community College Board.
If a bigger campus were to be built it would mean a tax increase for working
families. The need for a larger campus is not practical or a wise use of
taxpayer dollars. The LMC campus has unused capacity and forecasted
enrollment trends shows that an extension Center will meet the needs of
future students as enrollment starts to creep up. The trend of on-line classes
also continues to grow reducing the need for increased facilities.
There were discussions early on to move from the planned Trilogy and
Marsh Creek Road location, however a feasibility study concluded there is
no reasonable alternative to the original site, and the governing board voted
4-1 not to move the site, which it had already purchased. BART had urged
possibly moving the site to Highway4 and Mokelume Trail, however, the
BART Board had made no official decision to pursue property for a future
eBART station near the intersection of Highway 4 and the Mokelumne Trail.
We have no secured land for a site near an e-Bart.
It would take an additional 3 or 4 years and cost an additional $750,000 or
more in site-selection processing expenses alone. The move would also need
to be approved by the California Community Colleges Board of Governors
or the district could risk losing lose $1.1 million per year in current revenue.
Pursing a new larger campus could result in a 10 year delay at a minimum
and impacting the services that are required for students.
The existing construction at planned facility at the 17 Acre center is
estimated at this time to be $43.6 Million dollars. The costs to move to a 110
Acre campus would be astronomical in comparison with the taxpayers
footing the bill for this increase, with no current basis for its usage based on
enrollment needs and trends compared to the approved 17 acre campus.
Mr. Enholm’s delaying tactics in stalling the construction has already cost
the district thousands of dollars. Mr. Enholm continues to advocate for a
larger campus for Antioch, Oakley and Brentwood. However, unless those
communities are willing to pay an increase in taxes, as the entire District
taxpayers would not support it based on past tax increase elections. A key
reason Measure E passed was because there was something for every
taxpayer.
Mr. Enholm continues to advocate for a campus in Antioch and Oakley and
stated in part that the reason he won his first election was that he went before
those communities and told them he would help build a larger campus.
However these communities were informed that Mr. Enholm did not have
the authority of Board approval for such a statement.
Mr Enholm’s desire to move the campus may be more in self-interest as
these new campus’s would be in Ward 5, which he presently represents. The
planned Brentwood Center is located outside of his ward. Self-interest is
never a reason to lobby for change that is not beneficial to the larger
community, especially our students.
We need fresh eyes, new ideas, and a leader who can bring people together
in order to solve problems with practical ideas and future thinking.
Fernando is listening. Fernando has the education, experience, and
commitment to bring needed change.
Vote wisely November 8th.